Sometimes a number of stories come out all at once, and reminds you that no matter the supposed ‘distance’ from my topic, economics are often central to individual and social practice. All of these stories came in one day, in the Phnom Penh Post.
One of the themes I’ve been concentrating on in my new research is primitive accumulation in Cambodia. Primitive Accumulation, as used by Marx, is the process by which relatively ‘free’ peasants, who lived socially off the land via the management and sharing of the commons, were transformed into waged laborers, or those seeking wage labor, the so-called working class. All of this of course has a great deal of contemporary resonance in watching Cambodia (or any number of other places) today. I’m hardly the only person to have noticed this. Anthropologist Iain Baird of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, has been publishing on this topic. I was fortunate enough to meet him in person last year, and he directed me to a number of his relevant articles, which I recommend.
Of course, in Cambodia, one of the great stories of primitive accumulation appear as land grabs. Dey Krahom previously, and Boeung Kak now, become relatively famous because of their location in Phnom Penh, but land grabs have been a constant threat in more rural areas for quite a long time. The Buddha sangha in Cambodia has been confronted with a scandal in the last few months, as activist monk Venerable Luon Savath has been progressively stripped of his ability to rely upon sangha requisites – especially shelter. Banned from staying in capital temples previously, he has now been evicted from Watt Ounalom. Some of his supporters – reportedly from Boeung Kak – helped him move his belongings.
More generally, Cambodia is waiting to hear the US government’s decision on import tariffs from Cambodia. Cambodia’s export markets are not terribly diverse, and therefore highly dependent on state-to-state relations with its few customers. The United States and the European Union occupy the biggest seats at the table. As a result, decisions on tariffs in the US make enormous changes in Cambodia. While the Cambodia garment industry has been adding jobs in the last quarter, the reduction or elimination of select tariffs would almost certainly result in the rapid addition of more jobs. This is absolutely necessary if Cambodia is ever to experience significant secondary industrialization and the development of a more varied urban workforce. Dependency on agricultural exports and garment work is a recipe for constant crisis. But, challenges in the judicial sector (widespread perceptions of corruption, e.g.) and in retention of profits (expatriation of profits, e.g.) remain the largest challenge in this regard.
Finally, after a series of mass faintings at factories, in which employers and upstream brands have promised investigations, etc., the Arbitration Council has declared a strike over irregular pay and 8 other significant problems illegal, and ordered the workers back to their stations. The union in question the Cambodian Coalition of Apparel Workers Democratic Union (C.CAWDU) has accepted the decision, but this is significant in so far as it appears to be setting the stage for the new norm that the government and the Garment Manufacturers Association of Cambodia (GMAC) are hoping becomes reality after the passage of the new Labor Law.